
Newport Beach, California
(949)
723-4473
Studio News

Maestro Steve Kerstein, judges and winners
of the 7th Annual Burbank Philharmonic Hennings-Fischer Foundation Young Artists
Competition on February 23, 2008. Pictured left to right are Olympia Philharmonic and Olympia Youth Orchestra Conductor and
Violinist, Fung Ho; Patricia Shanks; Burbank Philharmonic Trumpet Player, Larry Lippold;
Violinist, Anne Lee; Burbank Philharmonic Conductor, Steven Kerstein; Soprano,
Rena Harms; Orchestra Contractor, Mark Artusio and Beach Cities Symphony
Conductor, Barry Brisk.

Pirate Patricia has some fun entertaining at the October 2007
Studio Party.
In Session

Also in February 2006 Patricia Shanks (left) helped produce
a demo for student Cindy Franklin at Sonikwire
Studios.
StudioShanksMusic.com
For years I have been concerned with the lack of availability,
locally, of good instructional books for singers. As an outgrowth of that
concern and others, I have established a tiny retail arm to my studio business.
For those like me who turn into kids in a candy shop at the sight of a
collectible music book, or who drool over some hard-to-find treatise on singing,
ta-da! We now have studioshanksmusic.com
At present, sales are "in person" only. Internet sales
may be forthcoming. Please visit the Website to see what I have "in
store." Visit often to see what new "finds" I have in stock to
tease and appease your musical appetite.
By request...
For those of my
students who have been asking me to sing here is a video
sample. Recorded after the February 2004 concert at Old Town Music
Hall, this is a completely
off-the-cuff rendering of Victor Herbert's A Kiss in the Dark with accompaniment provided by Bill
Field on the mighty Wurlitzer theater organ. The live audience of 4 people
appeared to be pleased. And I had great fun singing with the mighty Wurlitzer.
This candid
moment was captured on a Canon ZR60 digital camcorder (complete with clicking
lens cap cover) positioned halfway back
and to one side of the house. The file is playable if you have the Windows Media 9
Player, a strong constitution and a high speed Internet connection.
A
Kiss in the Dark
The
Old Town Music Hall is a non-profit organization that presents classic
films, silent movies with organ accompaniment and live concerts. Click on the
text link in this paragraph for a schedule of events and more information.
For Teaching Purposes - Audio Samples
It is the brave voice teacher who uploads poorly recorded
examples of her singing from decades past. Many students have asked me about
what and where I have sung, and what I sounded like "back in the day." Here are
two samples, along with my comments about why these songs are good teaching
tools.
Long Time Ago (circa 1982)
This Copland song is wonderful for learning legato singing
and crescendo-decrescendo. The simplest tunes sometimes afford the singer the
greatest opportunity to color the text by coloring the tone. The accompaniment
in this Copland arrangement suggests the long line of passing time, with
occasional nuances like his treatment of "flowing water." The rhythmic motif
Copland picked up from the first two notes of the melody and which he uses
throughout, gives us the sense of hanging in space for a moment, as if lingering
in time to consider our lives as they were a long time ago.
I was masquerading as a mezzo soprano at the time I sang this
piece in concert. People (who didn't know voices) who heard me were telling me
that I was a mezzo. Since there was more work for mezzos and altos, I happily
went along with the crowd. But this incarnation of Patricia is singing with an
artificially dark tone and a depressed larynx. This 1982 Patricia is
micro-managing the voice in an effort to turn it into something it is not. The
vibrato is more of a bleat than it is a free vibrato. This voice production
became problematic within a few short years and I re-learned how to support low,
allow the breath to flow, gain strength through vowel formation and resonance
and become friends with my old soprano self again.
We sometimes learn larger lessons by making mistakes than we
do by always being perfect.
So Many Stars (circa 1975)
This Sergio Mendez song is great for pop and jazz singers who
want to learn how to sing large interval leaps without changing voice quality
and sounding like Jekyll and Hyde (not the musical). I like many of the Latin
Jazz songs of the 1960s and 1970s, because they fall into the soprano range.
Much of the popular music, today, requires soprano voices to sing in the modal
speech-level range, in the passaggio and into the lower middle voice. There are
ways to brutalize the voice and force notes through the lower middle. And there
are ways to finesse the voice into singing those notes. The singer interested in
vocal longevity learns how to make comfortable adjustments in this range.
Singers who only practice singing in the lower range will find their upper range
becomes atrophied. Many singers come to me thinking they have no upper range.
Very often there is more than an octave available to them up there which they
are not using. They simply need to find it and use it.
At age 20, Patricia did (and still does) sing popular music, lest my students
think I am only an opera hound. I apologize for the sound quality in this clip.
Actually, I am fairly impressed that a cassette tape that sat for over 30 years
in a cardboard box in who knows what kind of conditions still played at all! And
here is evidence that the old Norelco Cassette Tape Recorder with the hand-held
microphone had some kind of a limiter - or something. The higher part pulled way
back. After applying eq ... eq ... more, and more eq ... oh, so much eq ... this
was the best I could do. Consider the tape hiss and flutter, well, "effects."
The 1970s Rhodes Piano had a Leslie on too much thyroid medication, I think.
Definitely hyper-active. Click the link at your own risk.
Excerpts from the Studio Newsletter
The Student of Voice as Apprentice
a sensible approach: train, then coach
music education or music entertainment
Why classical vocal training?
standards for song selection for young
voices
Voice Clips: sell the steak, not false
sizzle
All stories Copyright
©
Patricia Shanks
All that we are, we are because of the practices and discoveries of the
past. All that we have become, we have become because of the work of those who
have preceded us. When we forget our history, when we choose to ignore the
discoveries of our ancestors, we are limiting the quality of our experiences and
we are shortchanging the experiences of future generations.
In centuries past, school-aged apprentices spent long hours studying and
copying the handicrafts of their masters. The young apprentices watched with awe
as deft masters created quality works of wood, silver, or leather. In this same
manner, young singers-in-training gained technical prowess and an in-depth
understanding of their art and the workings of the voice from master singers and
teachers.
Both the master and the apprentice knew that the apprentice would spend many
years perfecting the work at hand. Apprentice craftsmen hoped to one day carry
on the work of their masters and, perhaps, even improve upon it. Of course, the
master was obliged to pass his trade and tradition on to that special apprentice
who could create and offer products of equal or better quality to his customers.
Nothing less would suffice.
In the case of the apprentice singer, it was not unusual for the singer to
make his or her debut performance nearly ten years after beginning serious,
daily training. This was the case well into the 20th Century.
According to voice teacher Elvira de Hidalgo, her teen-aged student Maria
Callas arrived at the conservatory for her voice lesson at ten in the morning
and she stayed at the conservatory until eight at night. It has been noted that
the future opera star sat in on all of the lessons of Hidalgo's other students.
By concentrating her efforts and reinforcing her work with this additional,
unassigned work, the singer was able to master her own instrument. She observed
the mistakes and the successes of others and applied what she had learned. In
addition to the long hours of practice and study she put into her own singing,
Callas spent countless hours observing and absorbing techniques handed down from
century to century, and master teacher to master teacher.
By contrast, many singers today wonder why, after a handful of lessons and
after amassing little to no basic knowledge of how the vocal mechanism
functions, they are not polished performers. This impatience and basic lack of
understanding concerning the amount of work it takes to hone vocal skills is
becoming pandemic. Consequently, singers possessing incomplete vocal abilities
are suffering vocal setbacks and shortened careers. Because traditions and
valuable information pertaining to voice production and vocal longevity are
being lost for lack of use, we are in danger of establishing a lower standard of
vocalism and vocal performance. The would-be singing artists of the future and
those who would be the master teachers may never be exposed to the information
they need to polish their skills to their utmost brilliance, because the
information of past masters is being selected out of the training process.
Sometimes the truths of the masters are reinvented by voice teachers who choose
to cater to the impatience of the student singer. More palatable techniques
designed, supposedly, to “shortcut” the process of learning to sing are then
passed from teacher to teacher, further denigrating the art of singing. Even the
best teachers unwittingly fall into some of these shortcut traps, because they
have learned the techniques from their teachers.
Today, singers must be proactive in their quest for information about voice
production. They must study the singers of the past, recordings of past and
current singers, and biographical accounts. In the absence of affordable daily
instruction provided by master singers and teachers and an environment that
supports serious voice training, singers must conduct their own research on
their art. The singer must experiment with technique and pay attention to the
techniques practiced by other singers. The singer-in-training must operate like
an Olympic Athlete-in-training, often without the benefit of a coach who will
offer guidance and nurturance and who will push daily for a higher standard of
performance. Today's apprentice singer must be his or her own disciplinarian,
doing whatever it takes to make certain that the finished product is worthy of a
tradition set forth by master teachers and singing artists of centuries
past.
Just as a dancer, a gymnast or a figure skater learns the steps and the
moves before putting together and practicing a routine, the intelligent singer
learns how to sing all the notes before putting them into the practice of a song
or a staged performance.
The reasons for pre-training your voice are many. Here are a few of the more
important ones.
1) You want to know what to expect from your vocal instrument on any given
note and on any given word. An untrained singer never knows what to expect from
one day to the next. 2) You want to know how to protect your precious instrument
and prevent short-term or long-term injury. 3) You do not want to have your
energy consumed with struggling to get the sound out or trying to avoid pains
and strains while singing. To the thoroughly trained singer, technique is second
nature. The trained singer can focus more on the performance and less on getting
the notes out. 4) The vocal quality of the trained singer is far superior when
matched with that of the untrained singer. Training allows for more tone
coloration, a wider dynamic range, full use and blending of the registers and
much more. While an untrained singer may exhibit equal performance prowess and
exude as much charisma as the trained singer, voice-to-voice the trained singer
is unbeatable. 5) Whether the music is rock, pop, jazz, country, musical theater
or classical, the trained singer has a better ability to meet the demands of the
music. A singer with long-range career aspirations is well served by extensive
training and practical voice work.
A voice teacher is your first stop. The teacher will monitor
your practice of vocal exercises carefully, helping you realize the correct
sensations of tone while, at the same time, introducing you to the physiology of
singing. The teacher may also ask you to practice exercises from complementary
method books structured to build the voice.
Concurrent with this technical training, the voice teacher will strive to
awaken creativity and artistry in the student. The teacher takes the entire
person into account and endeavors to shape the emerging artist.
A student may expect to study with a voice teacher from six months to one
year before noticing significant improvement. Of course, this assumes diligent
practice habits on the part of the student. Expect to study regularly for five
years or more before you begin to perfect your technique. Serious singers take
voice lessons throughout their careers.
After you have a basic working knowledge of your vocal mechanism and after
you have mastered some of the fundamentals of producing a solid sound, you might
consider working with a voice coach. The coach will help you
establish a musical style. The coach will work with you to select songs
appropriate to your sound, voice type and range. The best coaches usually
specialize in one style of music or another. Do not go to an opera coach for
help with a rock song, or to a country music coach for assistance on a song from
musical theater.
Be sure your basic technique is solid before you dive into working with a
coach. If you decide to forsake good technique in favor of potentially harmful
stylistic vocal maneuvers, you want to be clear about how to return to a
non-stressful way of producing sound. Often, the well-trained singer can find a
better way to achieve the desired effect without sacrificing vocal quality.
Some voice teachers are also good coaches. In rarer instances, voice coaches
may be equipped to teach you a thing or two about voice production.
Once you have a good technical foundation and you have established a style
and memorized some songs, or repertoire, you may wish to visit a performance
coach. The performance coach sometimes works under the title of voice
teacher or voice coach, but the performance coach is distinctly different in
approach.
The performance coach may have you warm up your voice, briefly. Usually,
there is little to no mention as to how to perfect vocal exercises. As a rule,
the performance coach is not concerned with vocal anatomy, physiology or
technique. Pedagogical aspects of singing are secondary to packaging you as a
performer. Singers who have bypassed work with a teacher and a repertoire coach
may learn songs and vocal stylings from a performance coach. This practice is
not desirable and might be compared to cramming for an exam using Cliffs Notes.
You might get through the exam, but you will not remember the material a week
from Tuesday. And what you have studied is only the surface layer of the
material. The real growth and discovery experience and accumulation of knowledge
and expertise in the subject have been replaced with an incomplete, unrewarding
and all around less than satisfactory or satisfying experience. The
moral of the story: Know your technique, memorize your music and develop
your style before you leap up onstage.
The preceding example notwithstanding, working with a performance coach can
be beneficial to you as a performer. You will learn how to move onstage and use
a microphone, among other performance-oriented skills. You might look for a
coach who offers regular performance opportunities to students who are ready to
rock 'n roll in front of an audience.
I teach my students what they need to know so they can do what they want to
do and do it well. In this studio we begin with the basics and establish a solid
foundation. I give my students specific practice goals and I expect results.
When students show me they have done their homework, they are rewarded with more
challenging assignments. Those who respond favorably to the challenge will grow
as musicians.
All music instruction is not equal
Sometimes lessons take the form of a recreational activity. The emphasis is
on fun. Students sing or play through songs with questionable teaching or
learning value. There is little to no mention of music theory, history,
technique or form. Performance goals often overshadow or altogether replace
important intermediate goals. Technical work takes a back seat. The prepared
song is not the result of steady technical training and artistic enlightenment.
It is not a true expression of
the artist in the musician. It is a contrived structure.
A case for education over entertainment
A person who learns to do one thing well understands many things and much
about the world. Properly handled, music education is more than just learning to
sing or play the piano. When we learn, we grow. With intellectual growth we have
the potential to become clearer, deeper, more critical thinkers, and better
overall beings and doers. With intellectual growth we also gain confidence and
self-respect. Self-respect (self-esteem) doesn't come from somehow managing to
sing or play a parcel of songs in a surface-level pleasing manner. At best, such
an experience is incomplete. Self-respect stems from the security of knowing
what you are doing, knowing how you are doing it, and knowing you are doing it
well according to established and
recognized standards of excellence.
What you know, you own. What you become, based on what you learn, is yours
forever. No one can take knowledge and expertise away from you and it never
leaves you. And the surprising bonus that comes with learning well is that you
will probably find you no longer need praise from others to feel good about what
you do and who you are. When the goal of activity is to do the thing you
are doing well, and meeting the highest standards possible, the challenge and
every small or large success along the way become the rewards.
¨
“Wisdom begins with sacrifice of immediate pleasures for long-range
purposes.” -- Louis Finkelstein
“Self-esteem is the reputation we acquire
with ourselves.” -- Nathaniel Branden
Ten reasons for a traditional
approach
There are countless reasons for a traditional approach to voice study.
Here are just a few.
- You learn to use and blend the entire range of your voice.
- You learn healthy, harm-free voice management.
- You learn vocal skills you can fall back on when techniques based on
style let you down.
- You learn about the physical and artistic components and processes of
clear, clean singing.
- You learn about languages -- including your own!
- You learn the most efficient and effective breathing techniques.
- You learn concepts that carry over to your speaking voice.
- You learn techniques that centuries of singers have learned and used
successfully.
- You learn about self-discipline and its benefits and rewards.
- You learn about your self. Learning to sing in a way that involves no
mimicry, masking or false application of style can be an extremely cathartic
experience.
In a previous newsletter article I detailed the standard voice ranges for
young children up to age 10. Young voices should sing roughly between Middle C
and the C one octave (eight notes) above Middle C. This goes for boys and girls.
While young singers may be able to sing lower or higher than this, it is unwise
for them to do so while in the early stages of physical and vocal development.
In most cases, notes sung above and below this range are produced through
unnatural means. A thin, tight-throated upper range or a forced lower range will
eventually take a toll on the voice.
Left to their own devices, young people might opt to sing the songs they hear
on the radio. Ranges for most of these songs are completely inappropriate for a
developing voice. The rhythmic and melodic structures of popular songs usually are not conducive to voice
building. If a song can be transposed into a more child voice-appropriate range,
the young singer resists singing it because it "doesn't sound like it does
on the recording."
It is difficult to get children to sing the music
that is voice appropriate because it sounds corny, old-fashioned or stupid to
them. Children as
young as age 5 have appeared in my studio, telling me they want to sing like the latest rock star. Then,
they launch into some adult-themed selection about the end of a relationship or
falling in love again, complete with fabricated gestures and dance moves. The
child has spent however long she has spent learning to be 'like' somebody else,
instead of finding out who she is and what her own voice sounds like. The
process of personal discovery and vocal discovery has been sidestepped. The fact
is, music that comes from the inside is much more long lasting and more
meaningful than that which is put on from the outside.
I purposely select teaching pieces that the young singer may not have heard
before, for several reasons. These are only a few.
When the singer does not know the song, she is more inclined to look at the
music. This is the beginning of learning to read notes. By contrast, when a
singer has heard the song she believes she has no need to look at the notes on
the page. Looking at the notes on the page is important. There is a direct
relationship between the adjustments the voice makes
and the notes on the printed page. Real singing musicians learn to read music.
Songs in other languages are particularly good for young singers (or any age
singer, for that matter), because they keep the mind and the voice free from
preconceived ideas of what the song means or ways of pronouncing words.
Sometimes the greatest discoveries come from a place of not knowing. Regional
speech dialects applied to singing can interfere with free voice production.
Songs from various periods in history teach more than just the song. They
teach musical style and much about who we were then and who we are now. Any
effective study teaches more than the subject at hand.
Songs structured similarly to vocal exercises reinforce the training of the
voice. Certain word and note combinations are more
vocally friendly than others. Certain songs support the steady, progressive
training of the vocal muscles.
When introduced to a wider variety of music, the young singer is more likely
to find her own style somewhere in the mix than she is to copy the one style she is bombarded with on the radio. She may also find other
interests when she is exposed to note reading,
musical form, languages and history.
I would be doing the young singer a disservice if I were to allow her to sing
whatever she wanted to sing, no matter what the quality and appropriateness. The
young singer does herself a disservice and limits her potential when she resists
the learning experience and chooses to sing songs that may be detrimental to her
present or future voice.
Traditional voice training contributes to vocal health and longevity no
matter what style of music the singer evolves to sing.
When the traditionally trained singer chooses to sing in a manner that is less
than voice-friendly and it causes problems, she will
have something solid to fall back on.
¨
“Personally I am always ready to learn, although I do
not always like being taught.”
-- Winston
Churchill
Less is more when it comes to "selling" a song onstage. The best
approach to expressing feelings in a song is to let your emotions arise
spontaneously. The feelings you put into your song have more to do with 1) your
genuine emotion at the time you are singing (which often has nothing to do with
the emotions expressed in the text of the song) and, 2) the emotions the text
and mood of the song evoke in you (which also may be other than what the text
presumes on its surface).
If you force emotions, your song will come across as less than genuine. Your
audience will know it. If you add postures or gestures in a mock effort to add
emotional flair to your performance, it will look fake. Your audience will know
it.
When it comes to communicating your song in an effective way, very often,
less is more.
¨
“To be properly expressed a thing must proceed from within, moved by
its form.” -- Meister Eckhart
Patricia Shanks Patricia
Shanks Voice Studio